TV Violence and Children No. Television can be a powerful influence in developing value systems and shaping behavior.
Violence It is difficult to set down in a definitive way what effect media violence has on consumers and young people. The reality is that we have not yet successfully defined violence and aggression, whether when analyzing the content we consume, or investigating the potentially resultant aggressive behaviour.
Because individual studies define these notions differently, the goal posts are constantly moving for anyone who is trying to get a big picture look at the situation. First, media violence is notoriously hard to define and measure.
Some experts who track violence in television programming, such as the late George Gerbner, defined violence as the act or threat of injuring or killing someone, independent of the method used or the surrounding context.
As such, Gerber included cartoon violence in his data-set. But others, such as University of Laval professors Guy Paquette and Jacques de Guise, specifically excluded cartoon violence from their research because of its comical and unrealistic presentation.
Second, researchers disagree over the type of relationship the data supports. Some argue that exposure to media violence causes aggression. Third, even those who agree that there is a connection between media violence and aggression disagree about how the one affects the other.
Some say that the mechanism is a psychological one, rooted in the ways we learn. Other researchers argue that it is the physiological effects of media violence that cause aggressive behaviour. Exposure to violent imagery is linked to increased heart rate, faster respiration and higher blood pressure.
Still others focus on the ways in which media violence primes or cues pre-existing aggressive thoughts and feelings. Violent video games are not causally related to incidents like high school shootings. Violent video games may desensitize players to other violent images and emotional stimuli.
Despite the emphasis placed on the possibility of violent media as a risk factor for youth violence, there are a number of far more relevant risk factors that are less frequently discussed.
These include poverty, education, discrimination, and home life. The problem is that many of these media products are also intended for adults or older audiences.
Moreover, development issues, emotional maturity, and relationships with peers and family seem to play a much more significant role in determining if a child is at risk for violent behaviour.
Ever since the s, laboratory experiments have consistently shown that exposure to violence is associated with increased heartbeat, blood pressure and respiration rate, and a greater willingness to inflict pain or punishment on others.
A number of surveys indicate that children and young people who report a preference for violent entertainment also score higher on aggression indexes than those who watch less violent shows. In a study conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation in  nearly half 47 per cent of parents with children between the ages of four and six reported that their children had imitated aggressive behaviours from TV.
Tom Van der Voort  studied children ages nine through 12 in He found that although children can easily distinguish cartoons, westerns and spy thrillers from reality, they often confuse realistic programs with the real world.
This is particularly problematic because the children reported that they prefer realistic programs, which they equate with fun and excitement. George Gerbner conducted the longest running study of television violence. His seminal research suggests that heavy TV viewers tend to perceive the world in ways that are consistent with the images on TV.
They surveyed university students, and found that heavy television viewers are more likely to believe the world is a more dangerous place. A number of studies since then suggest that media is only one of a number of variables that put children at risk of aggressive behaviour.
For example, a Norwegian study  that included 20 at-risk teenaged boys found that the lack of parental rules regulating what the boys watched was a more significant predictor of aggressive behaviour than the amount of media violence they watched. On the other hand, researchers report that parental attitudes towards media violence can mitigate the impact it has on children.
There are clearly concerns with regards to violent media content such as age-appropriateness, saturation, desensitization, and instilling fear or unease in viewers. At the same time, many of the media products through which we are exposed to violent imagery provide benefits as well.
Games and movies may expose young people to some violent content, but studies increasingly show that they also offer positive benefits. More on how to talk about media violence with children can be found in the subsection Critically Engaging with Media Violence.
If you are interested in legislation and industry tools that can help you to understand laws or give you a better idea of what to look out for, see our Government and Industry Responses to Media Violence. Causal Relationship or Moral Panic?The Relationship Between Television Violence and Children Violence in Reality PAGES 5.
WORDS 1, View Full Essay. More essays like this: violent television, children violence in reality, television violence, effects of television violence.
Not . Most importantly, efforts should be directed at dramatically decreasing the exposure of children and adolescents to violence in the home, community, and through the media. Clearly, violence leads to violence. TV Violence and Children.
No. 13; Updated December Extensive viewing of television violence by children causes greater aggressiveness. Sometimes, watching a single violent program can increase aggressiveness. If you find Facts for Families© helpful and would like to make good mental health a reality, consider donating to the.
Cultivation Theory doesn't predict what we will do after watching a violent television program, but rather posits a connection between our worry and fear about a violence-filled world and exposure to violent programming on television.
This is a key limitation of current theory within media violence research; failed to find a link between television violence and aggressive behavior in most of the countries included in the analysis (including America, and even in studies on American boys). Research in Europe and Australia on the relationship between media and violence.
The reality is that we have not yet successfully defined violence and aggression, whether when analyzing the content we consume, or investigating the potentially resultant aggressive behaviour.