Aviation History delivers an entertaining account and perspective on international aviation history.
A sample book review What is a book review? A book review focuses on one book-length text and briefly summarizes its contents, identifying its thesis or main argument sand establishing the degree of success with which the author supports his or her claims.
Notice that the criteria of such an assignment far exceed the requirements for book reports, with which you are probably familiar from high school. A high school book report merely asks you to summarize the contents of a book and to conclude with your subjective opinion on whether you "liked" the book, and why.
Such a high school-level book report is not a book review, which requires far more. A well-executed book review will also hone your critical reading skills by inviting you to identify the author's perspective: How does the author's slant if any find expression? Does he or she challenge other writers' work and, if so, is this done in a persuasive manner, or does it seem motivated by petty professional or personal rivalry this also opens issues of historiography.
Is there anything in the author's own biography that may help explain though not necessarily justify any bias you have identified? All these are questions a well-executed book review will take into consideration.
To see the above-cited criteria applied to a book, click here. Objectives Critical reading skills aside, the basic objective of a book review assignment is twofold: When reviewing a book, you may want to answer some of the following questions: What is the book's main argument?
Who seems to be the intended audience for the book?
How is the book structured? Does the structure of the book its various parts and chapters reinforce its larger argument? What kinds of sources, or examples, does the book offer in support of its argument, and which are most and least effective?
Does the book engage other writers' works on the same subject and, even if not, how would you position the book in relation to other texts you are aware of on the same subject texts you have read for class, for example?
Does the author seem biased or prejudiced in any way and, if so, is that prejudice or bias the product of the author's own background, as far as you can tell? How persuasive is the book if certain aspects are more persuasive than others, explain why A Sample Book Review Let us assume that the text assigned for your book review is Iris Chang's The Rape of Nanking: This best-selling work of narrative history describes in graphic detail the imperial Japanese army's attack and occupation of the Chinese city of Nanking, which, Chang claims in accordance with most Western historians resulted in a six-week massacre of the civilian population marked by widespread rape, pillage, murder, and other atrocities.
This event is often referred to as "the Rape of Nanking. Below, we briefly respond to each of the bulleted questions above: The book's main argument is threefold: While her hoped-for objective, in this context, is that the book "will stir the conscience of Japan to accept responsibility for this incident," the larger argument is that history, including horrific history, needs to be told truthfully in order for us to learn from the past The book's intended audience is a non-academic American readership, generally uninitiated into the events described.
The book can fairly be called a work of popular narrative history directed at a mass audience. The book is divided into three parts, each subdivided into several chapters.
Part I briefly sets the scene by historicizing the Japanese codes of warfare and honor, then describes in detail the campaign waged by the Japanese and their many atrocities against the civilian population of Nanking in Many of these graphic descriptions are corroborated by eye witness accounts both Japanese and Chinese.
Part II describes the ensuing Japanese occupation of the city. An important aspect of this section is Chang's description of the lengths to which the Japanese government and military went to limit media access to the city in order to prevent news of the massacre from spreading she calls this "Japanese damage control" .
This section ends with the liberation of the city and the Allied war crimes tribunals, as a result of which seven high-ranking Japanese officers were condemned to death by hanging, and executed. Part III describes the efforts of post-war Japan, led by its politicians and historians, to cover up the events at Nanking, efforts Chang strongly condemns.
She concludes with the observation that although, at the time of the massacre, it was "front-page news across the world, Chang chooses her three-part structure in order to communicate the diversity of voices that need to be heard in order to fully comprehend the events in Nanking: That history has largely failed at its task to tell the full story is integral to her argument.Book Reviews.
Menu; What is a book review? Objectives; A sample book review; What is a book review? A book review focuses on one book-length text and briefly summarizes its contents, identifying its thesis or main argument(s), and establishing the degree of success with .
Book Reviews. View examples of student-written book reviews» I. Pre-Reading Tips: Familiarize yourself with the author's other work. This will help you position her within the broader field/subject area. All reviews begin with bibliographic information: the author’s name, the book’s full title, place of publication, publisher, edition, date, pagination, and cost, if known. In no more than two paragraphs, introduce the book. Example of a Book Review What follows is an example book review for the book Younger Evangelicals by Robert E. Webber. (Used with permission by the writer, and Bible College Students will all find it valuable reading. The book speaks of an emerging generation of leaders, who seek to share the.
A critical book review is a thoughtful discussion of a text's contents, strengths, and limitations. Writing Resources - Book Review - Hamilton College 0FFF3-FFEAB0AB1FB5ACB9.
For international students; For Māori students; For postgraduate students; For prospective students; Structuring the book review. Most book reviews are between words, though an academic review may go up to Sample book review. This book review is included here with the permission of both the author, Heather Kavan, senior.
Book reviews are frequently written by publishers, editors and newspaper/journal reviewers as part of the publicity process for a book shortly after publication or republication. They are also written by experts, academics, journalists, organisations with vested interests and students to develop an understanding of the place of a particular.
All reviews begin with bibliographic information: the author’s name, the book’s full title, place of publication, publisher, edition, date, pagination, and cost, if known. In no more than two paragraphs, introduce the book. Sample Movie Review for Students College Book/movie Review Format Although writing a book or a movie review is a common assignment, every professor has personal demands and requirements, which may greatly change the structure and the style of your task.