Chris Campbell, co-founder of Chameleon Cold-Brew.
This may be an individual or a group report. Whatever the situation, there are certain guidelines to follow in writing a case analysis that will improve the evaluation your work will receive from your instructor. Before we discuss these guidelines and before you use them, make sure that they do not conflict with any directions your instructor has given you.
The structure of your written report is critical. Generally, if you follow the steps for analysis discussed in the previous section, you already will have a good structure for your written discussion. All reports begin with an introduction to the case. In it you outline briefly what the company does, how it developed historically, what problems it is experiencing, and how you are going to approach the issues in the case write-up.
Do this sequentially by writing, for example, "First, we discuss the environment of Company X Make sure you use plenty of headings and subheadings to structure your analysis. For example, have separate sections on any important conceptual tool you use.
Tailor the sections and subsections to the specific issues of importance in the case. In the third part of the case write-up, present your solutions and recommendations.
Be comprehensive, and make sure they are in line with the previous analysis so that the recommendations fit together and move logically from one to the next. The recommedations section is very revealing because, as mentioned earlier, your instructor will have a good idea of how much work you put into the case from the quality of your recommendations.
Following this framework will provide a good structure for most written reports, though obviously it must be shaped to fit the individual case being considered. Some cases are about excellent companies experiencing no problems.
In such instances, it is hard to write recommendations. Instead, you can focus on analyzing why the company is doing so well, using that analysis to structure the discussion.
Following are some minor suggestions that can help make a good analysis even better. Do not repeat in summary form large pieces of factual information from the case. The instructor has read the case and knows what is going on.
Rather, use the information in the case to illustrate your statements, to defend your arguments, or to make salient points. Beyond the brief introduction to the company, you must avoid being descriptive; instead, you must be analytical.
Make sure the sections and subsections of your discussion flow logically and smoothly from one to the next. That is, try to build on what has gone before so that the analysis of the case study moves toward a climax.
Avoid grammatical and spelling errors. They make the paper sloppy.
If possible, do a search for more information on what has happened to the company in subsequent years. Following are sources of information for performing this search: The World Wide Web is the place to start your research.
Compact disk sources such as Lotus One Source and InfoTrac provide an amazing amount of good information, including summaries of recent articles written on specific companies that you can then access in the library. Simply reading the titles gives an indication of what has been happening in the company.
Annual reports on a Form K often provide an organization chart. Companies themselves provide information if you write and ask for it.
Fortune, BusinessWeek, and Forbes have many articles on companies featured in most cases. Be sure to look at this journal. Sometimes instructors hand out questions for each case to help you in your analysis.
Use these as a guide for writing the case analysis. They often illuminate the important issues that have to be covered in the discussion. If you follow the guidelines in this section, you should be able to write a thorough and effective evaluation.James Henry Williams, Jr.
is a mechanical engineer, consultant, civic commentator, and teacher of engineering. He is currently Professor of Applied Mechanics in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).He is regarded as one of the world's leading experts in the mechanics, design, fabrication, and nondestructive evaluation (NDE) of nonmetallic.
Learn About the Company's Rich Heritage at Our Digital Museum. Follow Us. the most recent SEC Filings in the Investor section in order to receive the most current information made available by Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Contact Us with any questions or search this site for more information.
Better Buy: Macy’s, Inc. vs.
J C Penney Company Inc. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends initiativeblog.com Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.
A choice of law analysis is only necessary if there is a conflict between the laws of the states in question. Id. Here, there is a potential conflict on the interpretation of (d) the location of the subject matter of the contract, and (e) the domicil, residence, nationality, place of incorporation and Stonington Insurance Company .
George Bochis is a seasoned manager and lawyer with over 20 years of successful project management experience. He has a track record of driving multimillion-dollar profit and portfolio value growth through strategic planning and business development solutions, and is a seasoned general counsel with expertise in leadership and management systems.
HBGary is a subsidiary company of ManTech International, focused on technology initiativeblog.com the past, two distinct but affiliated firms had carried the HBGary name: HBGary Federal, which sold its products to the US Federal Government, and HBGary, Inc. Its other clients included information assurance companies, computer emergency response teams, and computer forensic investigators.